boxerJKD.com
  • About JKD
    • What is Boxer JKD >
      • Kidney function
      • Information Sheet
      • What is Boxer JKD
      • Symptoms of JKD
      • Age of onset
      • Disease Progression
      • Treatment
      • Diet is important
    • History
    • Genetic expression >
      • Expression of JKD
      • Low JKD expression
      • Conclusions
    • Diagnosis
    • Screening Tools
    • Research
  • UK JKD
    • UK JKD pedigrees
    • Reporting a case
    • UK Breeding Recommendations
    • UK Screening Recommendations
    • Research Proposals
  • International JKD
    • Australia
    • Denmark
    • France
    • Germany
    • New Zealand
    • Norway
    • North America
    • Other Countries
    • South Africa
    • Sweden
  • Publications
    • Insurance Statistics
    • Renal Presentation
    • Staging & Management
    • SDMA Assay 2015
    • Hoppe et al 2000
    • Chandler et al 2007
    • Brum et al 2008
    • Kolbjornsen et al 2008
    • Claudio Brovida 2012
    • Pelander et al 2015
    • Boxer Daily 2015
    • Vet Times 2016
    • Boxer Update
  • More information
    • Blog
    • Facebook posts
    • Breeders experiences
    • Frequent Questions
    • Who is involved
    • Contact Us

Excluding dogs from breeding programmes

10/21/2015

0 Comments

 
A decision was made by BoxerJKD team early on not to report any cases earlier than 10 years ago. The disease has been with the breed for a very long time and it was not thought to be beneficial to look back too far as it is the current dogs that are important to the future of the breed. We also decided not to comment on the potential line of inheritance of the disease within the published pedigrees. A pedigree study easily identifies the common ancestors. Only producers of confirmed cases of BoxerJKD are shaded in blue. It is worth noting that many dogs in the published pedigrees could be shaded as being deduced carriers or as siblings to cases or other confirmed JKD carriers. So a dog being unshaded in a published pedigree does not mean it is completely without risk. 
The gene responsible for JKD is widespread and appears in almost all of the current breeding lines in the UK. There will be 'clear' dogs in those lines too. We just need to reduce the risk of using the sub clinical and carrier dogs and increase the chance of breeding to the clear dogs.
To preserve the genetic diversity you can not simply exclude all dogs with carriers or deduced carriers in their pedigrees. 
To decrease the current risks, it is suggested that breeders screen all their stock for low USG readings, reduce the inbreeding in their planned litters, not to double up on pedigrees containing carriers.
Any new cases of JKD found by the screening process needs to be reported and the information shared with other breeders, the parents of all JKD cases need to be immediately removed from breeding programmes.
For the overall genetic health of the breed, breeders need to use as many different stud dogs as possible rather than giving only one or two dogs all the stud work nationally. A 'popular sire' effect can be very detrimental to the genetic health of the breed in more ways than just the risks of JKD. 
If breeders become more acceptable to the recommendations and problems of BoxerJKD, then we may consider publication of the deduced carriers and full JKD inheritance history. But in the current climate it is hard to see the benefit of doing this. 
The solution to the problem is working with the current dogs, having an efficient USG screening programme of all puppies and breeding stock, together with the effective sharing of all of the available information with all Boxer breeders worldwide. 
Unfortunately, there is still much more to do, as only the pedigrees that have been shared to BoxerJKD team are available in the public domain. This is still is not the full current available picture. The incidence of JKD is relatively low due to the low penetrance and the over capacity of the kidneys. It is therefore extremely important that all BoxerJKD cases should be reported and the pedigree information shared. Too many cases are being lost to the study for many different and diverse reasons. But the open reporting and the sharing of all available pedigree information is fundamental to continuing to reduce the frequency of the JKD gene within the population.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    BoxerJKD

    Communication posted through Facebook

    Archives

    May 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014

    RSS Feed

Picture
Picture
No part of this website may be copied, published or reproduced without written permission
This website and contents are subject to copyright and remain the property of International JKD